Apparently, Playboy is now trying to regain their senses by offering the the cocoa Pop-singer goddess Rihanna to show her naked bits in their magazine but unfortunately for us, she’s turned down offers after offers despite the fact that everybody has seen her leaked naked pics in the past. Via Popeater:
“I got a few offers to do Playboy actually. They want to pay [me] to be naked on the cover,” she said. “If I’m gonna take my clothes off, it has to be in a classy way and my will, not a check. I wouldn’t take any money to do that.”
Well this blows. I was looking forward to seeing Rihanna’s chumbawambas in Playboy but I don’t think it will ever happen in a million years. Playboy and classy just don’t mix together. I guess we just have to deal with the likes of J-Woww and Snooki for the meantime…or not!
There are three things to rely on. The sun to shine, that McDonald’s will always have delivery and that Playboy’s charisma is slowly but surely being flushed down the drain. You’d know if you’re in deep shit when you bring past bitches, nevermind if they still look fit enough or not to pose naked, on the recent spreads( i.e. Pamela Anderson), need I say more? Well this time, they offered Kendra Wilkinson to pose naked but bitch denied the offer. You know you’re in trouble when even your past hoes don’t want to do anything with your shit. Well reports are saying the the reason why Kendra Wilkinson naked body won’t be on Playboy is because of her husband Hank. Via E! News:
He didn’t yell at me,” Kendra says. “He wasn’t mad at me for doing that photo shoot. He actually sat down with me and he went over the reasons of doing it. And you know, my reasons weren’t right. I wanted to do Playboy for the wrong reasons. The wrong reasons are to prove people wrong, not to prove it to myself but to people and to put my middle finger up to everybody and be like, ‘I’m going to do Playboy!’ But that wasn’t the right reason, you know?”
Could the reason behind Hank’s decision has something to do with the type of celebwhores Playboy have been courting to spread their legs for the mag? J-Woww, Oksana Grigorieva and Kate Gosselin, to name a few? I mean dude, I get that you’re trying to protect the dignifty of your marrying someone who used to lick on Hugh Heffner’s balls but it’s not like we haven’t seen your wife naked and banging a fugly-ass Albino in the most boring way possible, let alone a still spread on Playboy?!
Guess who’s posing again for Playboy after a freakin’ decade? Yep. Pamela Anderson’s tits, ladies and gents. Pammie has first stripped for the magazine back in 1989 and eventually she landed the title Playmate of the Year in 1990. Now reports are saying the 40-something year old MILF now wants to gross out people. Via Starpulse:
“And now, 20 years later, Anderson is baring all again for the January 2011 issue, cavorting naked in a pool as an homage to Ekberg’s infamous scene in Rome, Italy’s Trevi Fountain with Marcello Mastroianni in the 1960 movie classic.
On his Twitter.com page, Playboy mogul Hugh Hefner writes, “Pamela Anderson is in the (Playboy) Mansion swimming pool, posing for the January cover in a tribute to ‘La Dolce Vita.’”
Aww man this sucks. So I better quit writing Playboy for a while begging them for Mila Kunis on the next cover ‘coz this means they’ll be balls-deep stacked doing Photoshop shit on this next issue.
Who wants to see J-Woww naked? Seriously? Dayum. Playboy has just started to sound like a charitable institute all of a sudden. Imagine paying one of those fugly-ass bitches from Jersey Shore $400k to strip and offend people with her naked nalgas and punani? Where has the world gone to? Via Radar:
‘… there is a $400,000 offer from the mag for the Jersey Shore star to pose naked. We’ve also learned that the deal is not final and may face contractual obstacles from the reality TV show.
“Talks have been going on for a long time now and the highest offer she has received is $400,000,” revealed our source.’
Wow, has the magazine turned their taste towards MILFs? ‘Coz this bitch looks like she’s pushing 40 already. If that’s the case, why not let Pamela Anderson do the job instead of this trashy nobody. Then I figured out why. It’s a 2 for a price one package fellas! The gremlin whore Snooki might be in on this deal too. It’s a fuckin’ abomination!
Whip your weiner back in your pants because you won’t be seeing Rachel Uchitel’s big juicy ‘homewreckers’ in Playboy no more. Bitch got owned, and I mean that in the literal sense too. Apparently, she’s got this multi-million dollar settlement with Tiger Woods that restricts her to say shit about him in the interview. If one word about Tiger Wood’s pussy-loving ways come out of her big filthy mouth, she’s gonna lose the $10 million hush money.
So after thinking it over, and after a close friend of her who knows math explained to her that $10 million worth a shit ton than the $300k Playboy is offering, she quickly shut her legs close, pulled up her pants and kissed her Playboy dreams goodbye. Now ain’t life a bitch? Actually I don’t know who’s the bigger bitch between Tiger and Rachel. I kinda wanted to see this whore’s naked bits in Playboy.
This is it. Playboy has officially jumped the shark and lost it’s fuckin’ mind. E!Online is saying that the trailer trash Jersey Shore hoe J-Woww is going to spread her bare nalgas and punani in Playboy. I’m not sure what Heff is doing here. I mean is he digging his own grave and taking Playboy with him? Because that’s pretty much what it looks like. Via Fish:
So just how close is the Jersey Shore star to closing the deal to strip down for the mag—and just how undressed will she get? “Final offer is standing,” JWoww told me just the other day. “Hopefully, it will go through.” When is she looking to show off her nakedness? She smiled, “Winter.” In other words, it’s happening, people! JWoww smiled again, “I’d like to say so.” Still on the table is how much she’ll actually show. “I don’t know yet,” she said. “It hasn’t been talked about yet.”
Wow. Do us a favor and throw Snooki in there as well so we can all pretend we’re looking at a freakin’ comic book ‘coz this is all a big fat joke!
Though there are reports claiming Kendra Wilkinson is fighting the release of her sextape, here comes another side of the story that is not very surprising if you really think about it. Well, reports surface that Kendra was in the process of releasing her sextape herself more than a year ago.
According to RadarOnline:
Documents acquired by RadarOnline.com confirm that the Playboy pinup was in the process of releasing the tapes herself a year and a half ago! According to the documents, a company (which Wilkinson would own and control) would be formed and Wilkinson’s team would shop the tape around soliciting offers. Wilkinson would also be able to mandate how the tape would be edited before it was sent to potential buyers.
Kendra has yet to comment about these latest developments. Well, if this was her plan to get publicity for her sextape all along, then it’s definitely working! I guess I was wrong; I always thought Kendra was stupid.
Well, it isn’t really surprising that Kendra Wilkinson is the type who films herself while having sex, given that she was a former Playboy Playmate and Hugh Hefner’s girlfriend. So yeah, I believe Kendra has a sextape too. And Vivid Entertainment, the ones who released Kim Kardashian and Pam Anderson’s sextapes, will release Kendra’s tape entitled “Kendra Exposed” by the end of May, saying “this could be our all time best selling celebrity tape.”
The tape was allegedly made when Kendra was a teenager, and was shot prior to her moving into the Playboy Mansion. On the other hand, Kendra reportedly is fighting against the release of the tape, fearing it could destroy her marriage with NFL star Hank Baskett.
Come on. I don’t see any reason why Kendra doesn’t want this tape be released. I mean, from her not-so-wholesome reputation inside and out the Playboy Mansion, she practically is a walking sextape anyway.
Kim Kardashian revealed in an interview with May 2010 issue of Harper’s Bazaar that she regrets doing her 2007 Playboy shoot. She said:
“I’m sorry I did Playboy. I was uncomfortable.”
She also blamed her mother for it, saying Kris told her, “Go for it. They might never ask you again. Our show isn’t on the air yet. No one knows who you are. Do it and you’ll have these beautiful pictures to look at when you’re my age.”
Okay, what? She regrets doing a naked shoot? Has she forgotten she also has a sextape released on the internet, she’s more comfortable with that than with a printed copy of her naked self? What’s up with that.
Blake Lively wants out of her teen roles and wants in on matured ones. And her plan to get on this track fast? Do Hugh Hefner. I mean, do a Playboy spread. The Gossip Girl star is reportedly demanding $2.5 million to take her clothes off for the magazine. But Blake’s family is in the way, as her dad wants none of the Playboy stripping for the actress. Guess he doesn’t want to see her daughter nude in his favorite magazine, eh?